Keisha Brent Essays (622 words) - Education, Educational Psychology

Keisha Brent October 20, 2016 Psych 3820 A New School System In order for the philanthropist plan to donate money in the development of a school system in less industrialized country and it be successful he/she would have to come up with an outline. Within the outline they would have to know exactly what they will be donating money to and would the school system run properly. For instance they would need educators, updated technology, meal plans, books other supplies in order to bring the school system into the 21 st century. T his plan may or may not work due to the fact that the country more than likely have other economic problems and putting money towards education may backfire if things don't go right. Also the country more than likely have their own traditional way of living and became equipped with their daily routines. While the term "21st-century " is generally used to refer to certain core competencies such as collaboration, digital literacy, critical thinking, a nd problem-solving that help people strive to be successful and keep up with today's society. Being that this is a poor, rural, agricultural less industrialized country it would more than likely take time for everyone to adapt. Another thing the philanthropist may need to know is that there are differe nt types of learning; formal, non-formal, and informal . A formal example would be school and t o become truly literate in a 21st century classroom, it would seem both teache rs and students not only need a capable, working knowledge of the technologies available to them, but also knowledge about how to utilize those devices in such a way that meaningful learning occurs inside and outside of the classroom. Then th ere's non-formal , which would be educational programming aimed at those left out of formal education. This would be the discards of school system who usually are non-literate, making it more challenging for them to catch on to such an updated system. Lastly the informal way of learn ing normally would be taught by parents, peers, community members, etc which would also be the less likely to be affected by the "21 st century", upbringing. I say this becaus e people tend to learn things faster when they're raised around advanced technology and system updates, they become more immune. I n America we have come to value formal educa tion/ learning as a step ping stone to better opportunities career and skill wise, set apart from our context of daily living. In addit ion formal learning in the 21 st century here, teachers are responsible for imparting knowledge and skill, along with; learning via verbal exchange and teaching by verbal presentation. Were as we view informal here in America as embedded in our daily life activities and the learner is responsible for obtaining knowledge and skills. Usually learning by observation and imitation, while teaching via demonstration. Both being two good ways of learning and normally goes hand in hand. Over all the philanthropist plan would impact the traditional culture of the country significantly depending on how far behind there culture is from our 21 st century culture in America. Being that our technologies for most classrooms include such things as desktop and laptop computers, LCD pro jectors and SMART boards, w ith so many different technologies available, educators have their hands full trying to keep up with all the workings o f these capabilities. But once everyone get the hang of things the transition may be smooth and the plan could succeed with the right people and proper training. If the philanthropist really invest a wealthy amount of money its possible but will take time.